Split the Pie audiobook cover - A Radical New Way to Negotiate

Split the Pie

A Radical New Way to Negotiate

Barry Nalebuff

4.1 / 5(286 ratings)
Start ListeningDownloadQR code that opens AudiobookHub on the App StoreTry free on iPhoneScan to start in 5 seconds

If You're Curious About These Questions...

You should listen to this audiobook

Listen to Split the Pie — Free Audiobook

Loading player...

Key Takeaways from Split the Pie

Learning Tools

Reinforce what you learned from Split the Pie

Mind Map

Split the Pie
The Negotiation Pie Concept+
Convincing the Other Party+
Dealing with Stubborn Negotiators+
Information Sharing+

Quiz — Test Your Understanding

Question 1 of 7
According to the author, what exactly constitutes the 'negotiation pie'?
  • A. The total amount of resources available to both parties before the negotiation begins.
  • B. The additional value or resources created specifically by reaching a successful deal.
  • C. The ratio of fallback options that determines each party's relative power.
  • D. The 50/50 split of all available assets to ensure total fairness.
Question 2 of 7
Why does the author argue that splitting the total outcome 50/50 is not always the fairest approach?
  • A. Because it fails to account for the uneven fallback options each party has if no deal is reached.
  • B. Because the party in the position of power should always receive a proportionally larger share.
  • C. Because human psychology naturally rejects equal splits as a sign of weakness.
  • D. Because it encourages one party to act aggressively to claim more than their share.
Question 3 of 7
According to the 'negotiation pie' approach, how should the pie itself be divided between two negotiating parties?
  • A. Proportionally, based on the initial investments or fallback options of each party.
  • B. Evenly, because both parties are equally necessary to create the additional value.
  • C. Based on who has the stronger alternative outside of the negotiation.
  • D. It should be given entirely to the party that compromises first to foster goodwill.
Question 4 of 7
If your negotiating partner insists on a proportional split that favors them, what does the author suggest is the best way to convince them otherwise?
  • A. Ask them to step into your shoes and see how unfair the split feels from your perspective.
  • B. Threaten to walk away from the deal to demonstrate your willingness to accept your fallback option.
  • C. Show them a hypothetical scenario where the same proportional rule would be unfair to them.
  • D. Concede to their terms initially, but ask for a larger share of future profits.
Question 5 of 7
How does the author suggest dealing with a stubborn negotiating partner who issues an aggressive ultimatum?
  • A. Counter their ultimatum with an even stricter ultimatum to establish dominance.
  • B. Use hypothetical questions to test the rigidity of their stance and unmask their rationality.
  • C. Immediately accept their terms to deescalate the situation and build long-term trust.
  • D. Remain completely silent until they become uncomfortable and retract their offer.
Question 6 of 7
In the gas station example, how does Bob successfully close the deal when Alice refuses to lower her $500,000 asking price?
  • A. He discovers she needs a post-trip job and offers her a management position, reducing her financial need.
  • B. He points out that the market value of the gas station is significantly lower than her asking price.
  • C. He agrees to pay the $500,000 but structures it in installments over ten years.
  • D. He offers $500,000 but requires her to leave her sailboat as collateral until the transition is complete.
Question 7 of 7
What does the author mean by advising readers not to treat negotiations like a 'Miranda warning'?
  • A. You shouldn't assume the other party is trying to trick or interrogate you.
  • B. You shouldn't read the other party a list of rules before the negotiation begins.
  • C. You shouldn't hold back information or remain silent just because you have the right to do so.
  • D. You shouldn't involve lawyers or legal jargon unless absolutely necessary.

Split the Pie — Full Chapter Overview

Split the Pie Summary & Overview

Split the Pie (2022) reveals a new approach to how everyone should be negotiating. While negotiations often bring out the worst in people, it doesn’t have to be this way. By employing the “pie” approach, you can enter into any negotiation with the confidence that you’ll end up with your fair share.

Who Should Listen to Split the Pie?

  • Employees looking to negotiate a fair pay rise;
  • Students of business and management;
  • Anyone curious about the psychology behind negotiation.

About the Author: Barry Nalebuff

Barry Nalebuff is a Milton Steinbach Professor of Management at Yale School of Management. He’s also founded several successful businesses, such as Honest Tea. His introductory course on negotiation has more than 350,000 enrolled students both at Yale and online.

🎧
Listen in the AppOffline playback & background play
Get App