Fukushima audiobook cover - The Story of a Nuclear Disaster

Fukushima

The Story of a Nuclear Disaster

David Lochbaum, Edwin Lyman, Susan Q. Stranahan and the Union of Concerned Scientists

3.9 / 5(80 ratings)
Start ListeningDownloadQR code that opens AudiobookHub on the App StoreTry free on iPhoneScan to start in 5 seconds

If You're Curious About These Questions...

You should listen to this audiobook

Listen to Fukushima — Free Audiobook

Loading player...

Key Takeaways from Fukushima

Learning Tools

Reinforce what you learned from Fukushima

Mind Map

Fukushima
The 2011 Disaster Event+
Plant Vulnerability & Failure+
Information Suppression+
Regulatory Failures+
Economic & Social Devastation+
US Nuclear Vulnerabilities+

Quiz — Test Your Understanding

Question 1 of 7
Why was the 2011 earthquake off the coast of Japan particularly devastating compared to initial estimates?
  • A. It bypassed Japan's sophisticated motion sensor warning system completely.
  • B. It measured 9.0 on the Richter scale, releasing 45 times more energy than the initial estimate of 7.9.
  • C. It was caused by a giant catfish movement rather than tectonic subduction.
  • D. It struck directly beneath the Fukushima Daiichi plant rather than offshore.
Question 2 of 7
What was the primary reason the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant experienced a meltdown after the tsunami hit?
  • A. The tsunami physically breached the six-inch steel walls of the nuclear reactors.
  • B. The earthquake caused the nuclear fuel rods to instantly explode due to high pressure.
  • C. Operators mistakenly opened a special valve that released radioactivity into the environment.
  • D. The flooding cut off the plant's power, which was necessary to run the reactor cooling systems.
Question 3 of 7
Why did the Japanese government use the phrase 'fuel pellet melt' instead of 'meltdown' during the disaster?
  • A. They wanted to prevent public panic by using a more opaque and less alarming term.
  • B. The SPEEDI system provided incorrect meteorological data indicating a lesser event.
  • C. They wanted to accurately describe the technical difference between the two events.
  • D. Traditional Japanese media refused to publish the word 'meltdown' due to strict censorship laws.
Question 4 of 7
How did government regulators respond when nuclear inspector Kei Sugaoka notified them about a crack in a Fukushima reactor?
  • A. They immediately shut down the reactor to conduct an independent safety audit.
  • B. They implemented new, stringent oversight laws to prevent future structural issues.
  • C. They ordered Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) to deal with the issue themselves, leading to Sugaoka's firing.
  • D. They sued TEPCO for concealing evidence and downplaying significant safety hazards.
Question 5 of 7
Following the massive public demonstrations demanding the shutdown of all nuclear reactors in Japan, how did Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's government react?
  • A. They permanently banned the construction of any new nuclear power plants in Japan.
  • B. They ignored the public opposition and restarted two reactors at the Ohi nuclear power plant.
  • C. They transitioned the country entirely to imported electricity to appease the public.
  • D. They agreed to shut down all reactors for a ten-year evaluation period.
Question 6 of 7
Why do the authors argue that a similar disaster could happen in the United States, despite assurances from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)?
  • A. Several American reactors are located downstream from large dams, posing a massive flood risk if a dam were to burst.
  • B. American nuclear plants lack any form of earthquake warning systems.
  • C. The US experiences subduction earthquakes of the exact same magnitude as Japan on a regular basis.
  • D. American nuclear plants use the same outdated Soviet equipment that caused the Chernobyl disaster.
Question 7 of 7
How has the stated mission of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) changed over the years regarding public safety?
  • A. It replaced vague safety guidelines with strict, legally binding operational metrics.
  • B. It changed from 'monitoring nuclear energy' to 'eliminating all nuclear risk' after the Fukushima disaster.
  • C. It shifted from 'adequate protection' to 'reasonable assurance of adequate safety' to limit their responsibility.
  • D. It transferred the responsibility of 'public health' entirely to the Environmental Protection Agency.

Fukushima — Full Chapter Overview

Fukushima Summary & Overview

Fukushima (2014) tells the story of how one of the biggest tsunamis in Japan’s history combined with government neglect, corporate interest and propaganda to create the most serious nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. The book was written by the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit that brings together science and political advocacy.

Who Should Listen to Fukushima?

  • Anyone who believes nuclear energy is “safe”
  • People who want to know more about the Fukushima disaster

About the Author: David Lochbaum, Edwin Lyman, Susan Q. Stranahan and the Union of Concerned Scientists

David Lochbaum is the director of the Nuclear Safety Project for the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and one of the United States’ top nuclear experts.

Edwin Lyman is a senior scientist in the UCS Global Security Program. He specializes in nuclear proliferation, nuclear terrorism and nuclear safety.

Susan Q. Stranahan is an award-winning journalist who has written about the environment and energy for over three decades. Some of her other books include Sesquehanna, River of Dreams and Beyond the Flames.

🎧
Listen in the AppOffline playback & background play
Get App