Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be audiobook cover - An Antidote to the College Admissions Mania

Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be

An Antidote to the College Admissions Mania

Frank Bruni

4.3 / 5(44 ratings)
Categories:

If You're Curious About These Questions...

You should listen to this audiobook

Listen to Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be — Free Audiobook

Loading player...

Key Takeaways from Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be

Learning Tools

Reinforce what you learned from Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be

Mind Map

Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be
The Myth of Elite Colleges+
The Manufactured Admissions Crisis+
The Flaws of College Rankings+
The Drawbacks of Elite Schools+
What Actually Drives Success+
Actionable Advice+

Quiz — Test Your Understanding

Question 1 of 8
What does the data regarding Fortune 500 CEOs reveal about the necessity of an Ivy League education?
  • A. Over 80 percent of top CEOs attended Ivy League schools.
  • B. Only 30 percent of US-born CEOs at top 100 companies attended Ivy League schools.
  • C. Ivy League graduates are entirely absent from the top 10 Fortune 500 companies.
  • D. CEOs from Ivy League schools consistently earn higher profits than non-Ivy CEOs.
Question 2 of 8
According to former admissions dean Ted O’Neill, why have acceptance rates at elite universities dropped to record lows?
  • A. High schools are producing significantly smarter students, forcing colleges to raise their academic standards.
  • B. Universities are intentionally attracting huge numbers of applicants to lower their acceptance rates and boost their rankings.
  • C. Government regulations have capped the number of students that elite universities can legally enroll.
  • D. The rise of expensive college prep courses has made it impossible to distinguish between average and exceptional students.
Question 3 of 8
Why does former Yale dean Jeffrey Brenzel consider college rankings like the US News & World Report to be harmful?
  • A. They place too much emphasis on job placement and international opportunities rather than academics.
  • B. They heavily favor public universities over private Ivy League institutions.
  • C. They rely on unscientific criteria like wealth and subjective reputation rather than the quality of education.
  • D. They frequently change their criteria, making it impossible for students to predict which school is actually the best.
Question 4 of 8
According to a 2013 poll of college graduates, what behavior during college was the most significant factor in boosting a person's contentment later in life?
  • A. Earning a GPA of 3.8 or higher in a STEM-related major.
  • B. Dabbling in a wide variety of extracurricular activities to build a diverse resumé.
  • C. Securing a high-paying internship during the summer of their junior year.
  • D. Being deeply and actively involved in a single campus group or activity.
Question 5 of 8
What is the 'funnel effect' observed among undergraduates at elite schools like Harvard?
  • A. The tendency for students to enter with diverse interests but eventually narrow their career options to a few high-paying fields like consulting.
  • B. The process by which universities filter out lower-income applicants during the final stages of the admissions process.
  • C. A teaching method that forces students to focus exclusively on one major from their freshman year onward.
  • D. The phenomenon where students start with high grades that gradually drop as coursework becomes more difficult.
Question 6 of 8
What did Yale graduate Rebecca Fabbro discover when she researched her school's financial aid data regarding socioeconomic diversity?
  • A. The university provided equal financial aid to students from all income brackets.
  • B. Around 50 percent of Yale’s student body comes from the wealthiest 5 percent of the United States.
  • C. The majority of students at Yale relied entirely on federal student loans to afford tuition.
  • D. Yale had the highest percentage of first-generation college students among all Ivy League schools.
Question 7 of 8
How has the primary motivation for attending college shifted among incoming freshmen from the mid-1960s to 2014?
  • A. Students have shifted from wanting to discover a meaningful life philosophy to primarily attending college to make money.
  • B. Students have shifted from focusing on career training to prioritizing a well-rounded liberal arts education.
  • C. Students have shifted from wanting to stay close to home to desiring international travel and study abroad programs.
  • D. Students have shifted from pursuing entrepreneurial ventures to seeking stable jobs in government and academia.
Question 8 of 8
According to the book, what is a primary advantage of attending a smaller, less elite college over a highly prestigious one?
  • A. Smaller colleges offer guaranteed job placement in Fortune 500 companies upon graduation.
  • B. Smaller colleges automatically grant students higher GPAs to help them compete with Ivy League graduates.
  • C. Smaller colleges often provide a personal touch that fosters curiosity, creativity, and direct mentorship from professors.
  • D. Smaller colleges are completely immune to the bias of legacy admissions.

Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be — Full Chapter Overview

Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be Summary & Overview

Where You Go Is Not Who You’ll Be (2015) casts a critical eye over the mania surrounding the college admissions process in the United States. For decades, students and parents have become increasingly convinced that future success is dependent upon landing a spot at the most prestigious schools, while colleges have become engaged in their own competition for a spot at the top of the school rankings. Bruni argues that this has led to an out-of-control system that has caused people to lose sight of the real benefits of higher education.

Who Should Listen to Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be?

  • Prospective college students
  • Scholars who care about the state of higher education
  • Parents who want their kids to flourish in college

About the Author: Frank Bruni

Frank Bruni has been a long-time contributor for the New York Times, having been the paper’s chief restaurant critic from 2004 to 2009 as well as an op-ed columnist. His other books include the bestsellers Born Round (2009) and Ambling Into History (2002).

🎧
Listen in the AppOffline playback & background play
Get App